Categories
Headline Sports Agents Sports Law

Basketball Agent Aaron Mintz Sues Former Employer Priority Sports & Entertainment

On March 23, 2012, National Basketball Players Association (NBPA) certified player-agent Aaron Mintz resigned from Priority Sports & Entertainment.  Soon thereafter, Mintz signed an employment agreement with rival Creative Artists Agency (CAA).   I had reported that Mintz seemed extremely excited about the change of employment.

A Complaint was filed by Mintz against Mark Bartelstein & Associates, Inc., d/b/a Priority Sports & Entertainment on the same day that Mintz resigned from the company.  The Complaint for Declaratory Relief was filed in Federal Court in California by the law firm of Proskauer Rose LLP.

Mintz’s main claim is that his employment agreement with Priority Sports & Entertainment included a two-year non-compete clause (barring Mintz from directly or indirectly representing anyone who is a Priority Sports & Entertainment client) and that California (pursuant to California Business and Professions Code Section 16600) does not recognize such restrictive covenants.  Mintz has resided and worked in California for all 11 years of working for Priority Sports & Entertainment; however, what this case may come down to is whether the Court will allow Section VI of Mintz’s employment contract with Priority to come into play.  Section VI(C) says that disputes arising under the agreement will be governed by the laws of the State of Illinois and Section VI(D) states that the parties consent to the jurisdiction of the state courts of Cook County, Illinois, and further agree to waive any objection that they may have to the jurisdiction of venue of such courts to adjudicate any dispute arising under this Agreement.  Without a doubt, Bartelstein will attempt to use this clause to his advantage to have the case dismissed based on jurisdiction and also as an affirmative defense to Mintz’s claim that California will not permit non-competes.

Mintz’s rebuttal will be that the choice of law in the employment agreement does not control.  He will likely say that what must be looked at is the effect of the non-compete, which would restrict him from competing with Priority Sports & Entertainment in the State of California – where Mintz lives and intends to continue to practice his trade.  Further, Priority Sports & Entertainment will not be able to contend that it does not do business in the State of California.  The big issue is whether those arguments will be given more weight than the choice of law and venue clauses within the employment agreement.

Mintz also claims that Bartelstein had the ability to terminate Mintz’s employment without notice, but Mintz had to provide at least fourteen day notice, and that the unilateral notice period also restrained Mintz’s ability to compete.  This argument, on the surface, appears to be less attractive.

Aaron Mintz v Priority Sports

By Darren Heitner

Darren Adam Heitner, Esq., is a preeminent sports attorney and the founder of Heitner Legal, P.L.L.C., a Fort Lauderdale-based law firm specializing in sports law, contract negotiations, intellectual property, and arbitration. He earned his Juris Doctor from the University of Florida Levin College of Law in 2010 and a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science, magna cum laude, from the University of Florida in 2007, where he was named Valedictorian of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences. Admitted to practice in the state bars of Florida, New York, and the District of Columbia, as well as multiple federal courts, Darren also serves as a certified arbitrator with the American Arbitration Association.

As an adjunct professor, Darren imparts his expertise through teaching Sports Law at the University of Florida Levin College of Law and Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) at the University of Miami School of Law in the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law LL.M. program. His scholarly contributions include authoring several books published by the American Bar Association, such as How to Play the Game: What Every Sports Attorney Needs to Know, and numerous articles in prominent publications like Forbes, Inc. Magazine, and Above the Law. His thought leadership in NIL has earned him recognition as one of the foremost experts by The Wall Street Journal, USA TODAY, and On3, and he has been lauded as a “power player in NIL deals” by Action Network and a “top sports trademark attorney” by Sportico.

Darren’s passion for sports law led him to establish Sports Agent Blog on December 31, 2005, initially titled “I Want To Be A Sports Agent.” The platform, created as a New Year’s resolution, has grown into a cornerstone of the sports agency community, offering in-depth analysis of industry trends, legal disputes, and agent-player dynamics. His commitment to the field is further evidenced by his representation of numerous athletes and sports agents, as well as his prior role as an Adjunct Professor at Indiana University Bloomington, where he developed and taught a course on Sport Agency Management from 2011 to 2014.

Darren’s contributions have been recognized with prestigious honors, including the University of Florida’s 40 Under 40 Award, the University of Florida Levin College of Law’s Outstanding Young Alumnus Award, and designation as the best lawyer in Fort Lauderdale by Fort Lauderdale Magazine. He remains an active voice in the sports law community, sharing insights through his weekly NIL newsletter and his X posts, engaging a broad audience on legal developments in sports.

One reply on “Basketball Agent Aaron Mintz Sues Former Employer Priority Sports & Entertainment”

Comments are closed.