Categories
Sports Law

North Carolina Appellate Court Affirms Private Arbitration In NFL Agency Dispute

The North Carolina Court of Appeals has affirmed that disputes between sports agency businesses must be resolved through private arbitration when contractually agreed upon, rather than through NFLPA grievance procedures.

The underlying dispute arose from an “Alliance Agreement” between Premier Athlete Advisors LLC and EnterSports MGT LLC, two agencies that combined their football management operations in May 2019 to create a comprehensive NFL sports agency with a 50-50 split of costs and revenues.

After Premier terminated the agreement in August 2022, claiming EnterSports owed $37,748.19 for player-related expenses and revenues, the parties disputed where their disagreement should be resolved.

While both parties agreed that arbitration was required, they disagreed on the venue. Premier argued for private arbitration in Charlotte per their contract, while EnterSports contended the NFLPA had jurisdiction over the fee-sharing dispute.

The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s determination that the Alliance Agreement’s arbitration clause was valid and enforceable, covering “any dispute, controversy, or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement,” and that Charlotte, North Carolina was the proper venue.

The court emphasized that NFLPA Regulations govern individual Contract Advisors, not business entities. Certification is granted “only to individuals and not any firm, corporation, partnership or other business entity.”

Since the dispute involved two LLCs and Premier was co-owned by Matthew Flatow, who isn’t NFLPA-certified, the court ruled the NFLPA Regulations didn’t govern this particular business dispute.

EnterSports argued that Premier waived its arbitration rights by previously filing an NFLPA grievance, but the court rejected this claim, noting the Agreement’s waiver provision required any waiver to be “explicitly set forth in writing and signed by the Party”.

The court distinguished between prior grievances filed as disputes between two Contract Advisors and the current dispute between two limited liability corporations.

While NFLPA regulations govern certified agents in their individual capacities, contractual disputes between sports management companies remain subject to private arbitration agreements unless the parties voluntarily agree to have the dispute adjudicated through the NFLPA grievance process and the NFLPA accepts jurisdiction.

For agencies structuring partnership agreements, this decision underscores the importance of clear arbitration clauses and reinforces that well-drafted business contracts will be enforced according to their terms, even in the specialized world of NFL representation.

By Darren Heitner

Darren Adam Heitner, Esq., is a preeminent sports attorney and the founder of Heitner Legal, P.L.L.C., a Fort Lauderdale-based law firm specializing in sports law, contract negotiations, intellectual property, and arbitration. He earned his Juris Doctor from the University of Florida Levin College of Law in 2010 and a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science, magna cum laude, from the University of Florida in 2007, where he was named Valedictorian of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences. Admitted to practice in the state bars of Florida, New York, and the District of Columbia, as well as multiple federal courts, Darren also serves as a certified arbitrator with the American Arbitration Association.

As an adjunct professor, Darren imparts his expertise through teaching Sports Law at the University of Florida Levin College of Law and Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) at the University of Miami School of Law in the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law LL.M. program. His scholarly contributions include authoring several books published by the American Bar Association, such as How to Play the Game: What Every Sports Attorney Needs to Know, and numerous articles in prominent publications like Forbes, Inc. Magazine, and Above the Law. His thought leadership in NIL has earned him recognition as one of the foremost experts by The Wall Street Journal, USA TODAY, and On3, and he has been lauded as a “power player in NIL deals” by Action Network and a “top sports trademark attorney” by Sportico.

Darren’s passion for sports law led him to establish Sports Agent Blog on December 31, 2005, initially titled “I Want To Be A Sports Agent.” The platform, created as a New Year’s resolution, has grown into a cornerstone of the sports agency community, offering in-depth analysis of industry trends, legal disputes, and agent-player dynamics. His commitment to the field is further evidenced by his representation of numerous athletes and sports agents, as well as his prior role as an Adjunct Professor at Indiana University Bloomington, where he developed and taught a course on Sport Agency Management from 2011 to 2014.

Darren’s contributions have been recognized with prestigious honors, including the University of Florida’s 40 Under 40 Award, the University of Florida Levin College of Law’s Outstanding Young Alumnus Award, and designation as the best lawyer in Fort Lauderdale by Fort Lauderdale Magazine. He remains an active voice in the sports law community, sharing insights through his weekly NIL newsletter and his X posts, engaging a broad audience on legal developments in sports.